New TDS Framework Under the Income Tax Act 2025: Section 392 & Section 393 Explained

Open a TDS working file from any accounts department in Raipur and you'll see a column of section citations that looks almost decorative: 192, 194A, 194C, 194H, 194-I, 194J, 194Q, 194-IA, sometimes running to a dozen different references on a single vendor ledger. Each one carries its own rate, its own threshold, its own set of exceptions, accumulated over roughly six decades of Finance Act amendments bolted onto the original 1961 framework. Anyone who has trained a new accounts executive on TDS compliance knows how long it takes just to get the section-to-payment-type mapping to stick.

The Income Tax Act, 2025 does something about that, and this is arguably the single most consequential structural change in the new law for ordinary business compliance — more so than the Tax Year renaming, because it touches something businesses do every single month: deduct tax before they pay a vendor, a contractor, a landlord, or an employee.

The old scatter, briefly

Under the 1961 Act, TDS obligations lived across a long, unglamorous list of sections, each covering one category of payment: Section 192 for salary, 194A for interest other than on securities, 194C for payments to contractors and sub-contractors, 194H for commission or brokerage, 194-I for rent, 194J for fees for professional or technical services, 194Q for purchase of goods above the specified threshold, 194-IA for purchase of immovable property, and several more beyond these — 194D, 194DA, 194G, 194IB, 194IC, 194K, 194LA, 194M, 194N, 194O, 194R, 194S, and others covering more specialised payment types. Each section had accreted its own rate and threshold over years of amendment, and a few had picked up quirks that made sense historically but not on first reading — different thresholds for individuals versus companies, different rates depending on whether PAN was furnished, and so on.

What the new Act does: two sections, not two dozen

The Income Tax Act, 2025 consolidates essentially all of this into two sections. Section 392 covers TDS on salary — the direct successor to old Section 192, including the treatment of certain lump-sum payments from provident fund or superannuation fund balances, and it continues to place the responsibility on the employer to deduct tax based on the employee's estimated annual taxable income. Section 393 becomes the consolidated home for TDS on essentially every other category of payment — interest, commission, rent, contractor payments, professional fees, purchase of goods, property transactions, and the rest — structured as a table-driven regime rather than as separate standalone sections for each payment type.

This is a genuine architectural change, not a renumbering exercise dressed up as one. Instead of hunting through the Act for the specific section that governs, say, TDS on a consultant's professional fee, you go to Section 393 and look up the relevant row in its schedule of payment categories, rates and thresholds.

What doesn't change

The underlying deduction obligations themselves don't disappear and, as far as we can confirm from what's been published so far, the rates and thresholds carried forward from the old sections aren't being substantively altered by this consolidation — it's a restructuring of where the rule lives, not a rewrite of what the rule says. If your business deducts TDS at 10% on a professional fee above ₹30,000 today, there is no indication that obligation changes in substance under Section 393 — only that the citation authorising it moves.

Deposit deadlines (the 7th of the following month, with the March deadline extended to 30 April), the requirement to obtain and quote TAN, the quarterly TDS return cycle, and the issuance of TDS certificates all continue as mechanisms — the new Act reorganises where the underlying rate table sits, not the compliance rhythm around it.

What this means practically

Accounting and payroll software. Every reasonably modern accounting package has TDS-rate logic baked in — usually triggered by selecting a vendor category (contractor, professional, rent, and so on) that maps internally to the corresponding old section and its current rate. That internal mapping needs updating to route through Section 393's structure once Tax Year 2026-27 begins on 1 April 2026. This is squarely a vendor responsibility, but it's worth a direct conversation with your software provider well before the transition rather than discovering a stale section citation on a TDS certificate months later.

Vendor master data. Many businesses tag vendors in their accounting system by the old section number directly — a habit that made lookups fast but now needs revisiting. It's a reasonable moment to do a vendor-master clean-up alongside the software update, re-tagging by payment category rather than by a section number that's about to change.

TDS return filing. Quarterly TDS returns (Form 24Q for salary, Form 26Q for other payments, and so on) reference section codes in their schedules today. Whether the return forms themselves get restructured to reflect the two-section consolidation, or whether they retain something like the existing category codes internally while citing Section 393 externally, is a detail that hadn't been fully settled in public documentation at the time of writing. We'd rather say that plainly than guess.

A concrete scenario

A Raipur trading firm pays a transport contractor ₹85,000 in a month for freight, a graphic designer ₹40,000 for a one-off project, and its landlord ₹60,000 in monthly rent for its Pandri warehouse. Today, three different sections govern these three deductions — 194C, 194J, and 194-I respectively, each with its own threshold logic. From Tax Year 2026-27, all three obligations continue to exist, at what we currently understand to be the same rates and thresholds, but all three are cited to Section 393 instead of to three separate old sections. The firm still deducts TDS on all three payments; what changes is which section its TDS certificate and return will point to.

Cross-border payments and TCS

It's worth flagging that Section 393's stated scope extends to cross-border TDS as well as domestic — payments to non-residents that would previously have triggered obligations under Section 195, along with the surrounding machinery around lower-deduction certificates and treaty relief, are understood to fall within the same consolidated table-driven structure rather than sitting in a separate section as before. Businesses that import raw materials or pay for foreign consultancy or software licensing should expect this to be part of the same consolidation, though the practical mechanics — particularly around Form 15CA/15CB-equivalent certification — are another area where we'd want to see confirmed departmental guidance before advising a client on specifics. TCS (tax collected at source) under the old Section 206C framework is a related but distinct compliance stream, and businesses dealing with scrap sales, forest produce, or high-value goods should not assume TCS gets folded into the same TDS consolidation without checking separately.

The one thing we won't pretend to know yet

A lot of commentary circulating right now tries to map every old sub-category precisely onto a specific sub-clause or table row of Section 393 — claiming, for instance, that old 194J now sits at a specific numbered sub-entry. As of today, granular category-by-category sub-numbering within Section 393 isn't settled in reliable, circulated public sources to a degree we're comfortable stating as fact. If you see a source confidently citing "Section 393(4)(b)" or similar for a specific payment type, treat it with caution until it can be checked against the Act's actual schedule or confirmed departmental guidance. We'll update our practical guidance as the picture firms up closer to April 2026.

Related Advisory Services & Practice Guides

• TDS Return Filing in Raipur
• Accounting & Bookkeeping Services